Archive for September, 2018


Carlos S. Alvarado, PhD, Research Fellow, Parapsycholohy Foundation

The site SurvivalAfterDeath | CienciasPsíquicas, in Spanish, has much information about psychical research, particularly about mediumship and the topic of survival of death. There is a section presenting links to many important books, (click here), many of which have been taken from other digital libraries such as Internet Archive and Google Books. Here are some examples.

Baird, A.T. (Ed.). (1944). One Hundred Cases for Survival After Death.

Barrett, W.F. (1926). Death-Bed Visions.

Bennett, E.T. (1905). Automatic Speaking and Writing: — A Study.

Carrington, H. (1909). Eusapia Palladino and Her Phenomena.

Crawford, W.J. (1921). The Psychic Structures at the Goligher Circle.

De Morgan, S. (1863). From Matter to Spirit.

Fodor, N. (n.d.). Encyclopaedia of Psychic Science.

Fournier d’Albe, E.E. (1908). New Light on Immortality.

Gurney, E., Myers, F.W.H., & Podmore, F. (1886). Phantasms of the Living.
Vol. 1,   Vol. 2

Hamilton, T.G. (1942). Intention and Survival.

Hyslop, J.H. (1913). Psychical Research and Survival.

Lodge, O.J. (1916). Raymond or Life After Death.

Lombroso, C. (1909). After Death—What?

Maxwell, J. (1905). Metapsychical Phenomena.

Myers, F.W.H. (1907). Human Personality and Its Survival of Bodily Death.

Owen, R.D. (1860). Footfalls on the Boundary of Another World.

Schrenck-Notzing, Baron von. (1923). Phenomena of Materialisation.

Smith, W.W. (1920). A Theory of the Mechanism of Survival.

Wallace, A.R. (1896). Miracles and Modern Spiritualism.


Zollner, J.C.F. (1880). Transcendental Physics.

These are only a few examples of many other books available in this collection. In addition, the are many issues of the Annals of Psychical Science, and of the Proceedings and Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research.

image of sequence 7

 

image of sequence 11

Advertisements

Carlos S. Alvarado, PhD, Research Fellow, Parapsychology Foundation

Here is the abstract of an interesting thesis in history about Uri Geller and parapsychology in the 1970s.

Uri Geller and the Reception of Parapsychology in the 1970s, by Jacob Older Green. Masters’ Thesis, University of British Columbia, 2018.

Abstract

“This paper investigates the controversy following the publication of work by scientists working at the Stanford Research Institute that claimed to show that the extraordinary mental powers of 1970s super psychic Uri Geller were real. The thesis argues that the controversy around Geller represented a shift in how skeptical scientists treated parapsychology. Instead of engaging with parapsychology and treating it as an incipient, if unpromising scientific discipline, which had been the norm since the pioneering work of J.B. Rhine in the 1930s, parapsychology’s critics portrayed the discipline as a pseudoscience, little more than an attempt by credulous scientists to confirm their superstitious belief in occult psychic powers. The controversy around Geller also led to the creation of The Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal (CSICOP), one of the first skeptical organizations specializing in investigating supposed instances of paranormal phenomena. I argue that the shift in critics’ attitudes and the creation of CSICOP were partially due to a fear among some scientists and their supporters that the scientific work on Geller would lend legitimacy to the “Occult Revival”—a term used to describe rising popular interest in the occult, astrology and psychic abilities in the late 1960s and early 1970s.”